Excite Me

If it doesn’t excite you,
This thing that you see,
Why in the world,
Would it excite me?

 

-Jay Maisel

 

 

I came across this quote by photographer Jay Maisel yesterday and it really got me thinking about my thought process for picture taking and the impact it can have on other people.

 

I admit there are times when I go out with my camera and shoot a hundred pictures of random things only to get home and realize that maybe two are actually any good. Not because the exposure was off or the subject was blurry (although that happens sometimes too) but because it was simply an uninteresting picture. I was not engaged and interested in the subject.

 

This is why I try not to take too many pictures of flowers. I’m not a flower person. I think that unless you’re really into flowers and really know how to make them look interesting, they can be really boring photographs. Same with architecture. Unless you have some great gift at seeing lines and symmetry in a way that most don’t – a stairwell is a stairwell is a stairwell. I’m also not good with wildlife pictures. Some people can make a squirrel or an eagle look out of this world fantastic. You can tell when someone really “gets” wildlife. They show you a deep connection to the animal through their lens. Not everyone has that talent. I’m a people person. Sometimes I get other great stuff too but only if I’m really connected to the subject and see something interesting.

 

Take my balloon picture for example. It’s not a person but I can imagine a person holding them or a child lighting up at the sight of them or the hand that released them into the sky. I see something exciting and apparently a lot of other people do too. My mailbox picture had a similar impact. Yes, the DOF and lighting are kinda cool but I also think the selective perspective makes it an engaging shot. I think about the person who went there everyday for their mail, the significance of the number, the tiny details put there by the hands that made it. It’s interesting. And I think that’s the job of a photographer – to show people images that will move them, excite them, engage them.

 

This is my newest photography focus. I don’t want to take the same pictures that everyone else is taking. I want to find  ways to CREATE an image that is interesting and moving instead of just pointing and shooting. I’m doing this first by studying exposure inside and out. Did you know that your camera has at least six settings to capture a correct exposure? What changes in those six settings is the DOF and motion blur. Understanding how to achieve those looks on purpose will really transform you as a photographer.

 

Yesterday I took some pictures on Kite Hill at Magnuson Park here in Seattle. I got some cool shots of kite fliers that I can’t wait to show you tomorrow. Now go shoot something exciting.

show hide 9 comments

beth - I couldn’t agree more !!!

beth’s last blog post..so gross, but cool

Mesh - Word

Grey Street Girl - I love your balloon picture and your mailbox picture – just a gorgeous eye in both photos, and in all your work. Thanks for posting this quote – it’s very inspiring and I needed that today!

Grey Street Girl’s last blog post..On the Fringe of Wasabi

charlane - I know…I’m stuck with flowers sometimes as that’s all that is at hand. I guess that’s why I try to do different spins on them instead of just a nice focused seed catelog shot. Anyone with a nice point and shoot can do that. It’s what the photographer is doing with that shot. But, I also know that it’s quite typical to shoot a lot of shots and only like 10% of them. So with 300 shots…that’s true even with professionals.

I’m always up for a challenge.

charlane’s last blog post..‘I could tell you my adventures — beginning from this morning, it’s no use going back to yesterday, because I was a different person then.*

Georgia - very interesting post. i completely identify with what you say about flowers and wildlife and architecture shooting. but where i have a slight departure is my philosophy in regards to the quote. i know what he’s saying, but i also know there are many photos i take that do something for me that they simply will not for most people. and even then, there may be one person who gets the same thing out of it that i did. that makes it just that much more worth the shot.

but i know what you are saying, and i think you said so much more than just what the quote says. and i very much agree with it.

one of the things i admire about you is your creative take on your photos, and your obvious knowledge of your camera and what you can do with it.

i’d love to just sit with you some time and let you show me all my camera settings and what i can do with them. just tonight i was sitting trying to figure some of them out. i want to understand it better so that i can take more versatile shots.

Georgia’s last blog post..{sweet}

Jamie - Excellent thoughts Georgia. I have to admit that I’m few shots of whiskey into this reply (the Seattle Sounders are playing their first MLS game – woot woot). And you know, you’re right. There are some pictures that will speak to some people louder than others. But don’t you think it’s true – that if the photographer sees something interesting and finds a way to express that – than the picture will be more interesting too? I find myself going to your sight and seeing things that you’ve shot that are a totally different vision than what I would have seen. Still, I’m moved and intrigued by it and isn’t that the goal of a photographer anyway?

Simon Elwell - Here are my thoughts on the quote and post.

Day to day we take so many photographs and with each photograph there is an emotion attached. I can take a photograph of lets say for instance, a tree, and when I take it back to the studio and it has lost something.

To get that photograph of a tree, I have been in a beautiful location, surrounded by inspiring nature and maybe even got there with people I love. So I have all those influences at the time of my exposure, that when I see that image I get a flash of how I feel when I took that image. I have captured a personal moment and emotion, but the moment I look at it technically, the image turns into a just another photograph of a tree.

Trying to capture that emotion for everyone to see and experience at the time of exposure is the key, that is the hardest part to do as photographers. But thats what I love about photography. Getting that moment.

Think I just babbled too much lol. I noticed the link to Kelly and Shanes wedding at the bottom of this page, before the comment box. I am the photographer of that wedding and feel honoured that you added the link.Thanks.

Simon

Simon Elwell’s last blog post..Kelly and Shane’s wedding, 28 February 2009

Georgia - oh, definitely. i agree! i think we have the same philosophy. i guess what i was trying to say is i think you expounded on his quote and put it a way i agree with. but if i had just read his quote alone somewhere, i would not wholeheartedly agree with him. i would have a slight problem with what he said—especially not knowing it’s context.

Georgia’s last blog post..happy birthday, Ginger {and to everyone—happy first day of Spring}

Andie - Heehee, I loouuuurve flowers. And I totally get and agree with what your saying. Architecture, bleh! But I have friends who can take amazing shots of buildings. You do your craft so well! This hill for example…it engages me and makes me want to run up it and see whats on the other side. Your brilliant.
xxoo,
a.

Andie’s last blog post..The pace of a snail

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

*

*

There was an error submitting your comment. Please try again.

CommentLuv badge
F a c e b o o k